Understanding Pre-Existing Conditions in Injury Claims: What the Law Really Says About Aggravated Back and Spinal Injuries

How Pre-Existing Back and Spinal Conditions Affect California Injury Claims


One of the most misunderstood issues in personal injury law involves pre-existing medical conditions—especially back injuries, spinal degeneration, and prior trauma. Many accident victims worry that a history of back pain, chiropractic care, prior accidents, or degenerative disc disease will prevent them from pursuing a valid claim. Insurance companies often reinforce this fear by insisting that a victim’s symptoms were “already there,” or that the collision “did not cause anything new.”

But California law is clear: If an accident aggravates, accelerates, or exacerbates a pre-existing condition, the injured person is entitled to compensation for the increased harm. This principle applies even if the victim had a long history of spinal issues.

This article explains why pre-existing conditions are not an obstacle to a strong injury claim—and why back and spinal injuries require careful documentation and legal analysis.

I. The Legal Foundation: The Eggshell Plaintiff Doctrine

California follows a long-standing rule known as the eggshell plaintiff doctrine (sometimes called the “thin skull rule”). The principle is simple:

A negligent party must take the victim as they find them.

If someone has a pre-existing condition that makes them more vulnerable to injury, the person who caused the accident is responsible for the full extent of the harm, even if the injuries are more severe than expected.

Examples include:

  • Degenerative disc disease worsened by a collision

  • Latent spinal issues becoming symptomatic after impact

  • Prior back injuries aggravated by new trauma

  • A slip-and-fall that triggers previously controlled symptoms

  • A low-speed crash causing significant pain because of underlying conditions

Insurance companies may try to argue otherwise, but the law is on the victim’s side.

II. Why Back and Spinal Conditions Are Common in Injury Cases

Spinal structures are complex and vulnerable to trauma. Even minor collisions can cause:

  • Herniated or bulging discs

  • Facet joint injuries

  • Pinched nerves

  • Sciatica

  • Muscle tears or strains

  • Worsening of degenerative disc disease

  • Exacerbation of prior surgical sites

The Inland Empire sees thousands of these injuries each year, particularly along high-traffic areas in Rancho Cucamonga, Riverside, Ontario, Norco, and Fontana.

III. How Insurance Companies Use Pre-Existing Conditions Against Victims

Insurance carriers routinely rely on several tactics to deny or minimize these claims:

1. Arguing that symptoms are unrelated to the accident

Adjusters frequently claim:

  • “The pain existed before the crash.”

  • “Symptoms would have emerged anyway due to degeneration.”

  • “The imaging findings are chronic, not acute.”

These arguments are often medically incorrect.

2. Using imaging results against the injured person

MRIs often show age-related spinal changes in perfectly healthy adults. Insurers seize on:

  • Disc dehydration

  • Mild bulges

  • Degenerative changes

  • Facet joint issues

to suggest no new injury occurred—even when the accident clearly triggered new or worsened symptoms.

3. Pointing to gaps in treatment

If victims delay medical care because they hope the pain will go away, insurers misinterpret this as evidence that the injury is minor or unrelated.

To understand how spinal injuries are evaluated, visit our
Spinal Injury Resource Page.

4. Mischaracterizing pain as “subjective”

Back pain is often labeled as “unverifiable” unless supported by advanced imaging.
This is misleading—soft-tissue injuries and nerve-related issues are real and can be severely disabling.

IV. What Actually Matters: Medical Causation and Aggravation

The key question in spinal injury claims is not whether the victim had pre-existing issues—but whether the accident aggravated those issues.

Doctors and experts look at:

  • Symptom patterns before and after the collision

  • Changes in pain intensity or frequency

  • New limitations in movement or activity

  • Objective findings such as nerve impingement or muscle spasms

  • Whether prior conditions were stable, improved, or asymptomatic

  • Mechanism of injury (forces involved in the crash)

If the incident triggered new symptoms—or worsened old ones—the defendant is legally responsible for the increased harm.

V. Real-World Examples of Aggravated Conditions (Not Case-Specific)

While every case is different, these examples illustrate how aggravation works:

Example 1 — The “Dormant Condition” Becomes Active

A driver with mild degenerative disc disease experiences no pain until a rear-end collision causes severe lumbar symptoms requiring treatment.

Example 2 — Prior Injury Made Worse

A person with a controlled sciatica condition is involved in a T-bone crash and now experiences constant radiating pain.

Example 3 — Multiple Impacts Over Time

A fall or crash accelerates degeneration, leading to earlier-than-expected surgical intervention.

In each scenario, California law provides protection.

VI. How to Strengthen a Claim Involving Pre-Existing Conditions

These claims succeed when documented properly. Here’s what matters most:

1. Early and consistent medical treatment

Seeing a doctor right away creates a clear timeline linking the accident to the symptoms.

2. Clear medical history disclosure

Honesty about prior injuries actually strengthens your credibility.

3. Comparative medical records

Doctors often compare:

  • Pre-accident imaging

  • Post-accident imaging

  • Symptom journals

  • Pain scales

  • Functional limitations

This highlights the change caused by the incident.

4. Legal analysis of aggravation

Attorneys interpret medical findings in the context of:

  • California negligence law

  • Impact biomechanics

  • Prior level of functioning

  • Long-term consequences

If you believe your spinal or back condition worsened after a crash, learn more at our
Car Accident Lawyer Page.

VII. Why These Cases Often Require an Attorney

Insurers aggressively dispute spinal injury claims because:

  • Damages can be substantial

  • Pain and treatment may be long-term

  • Surgical recommendations dramatically raise case value

  • Pre-existing conditions offer “easy targets” for adjusters

A skilled attorney:

  • Works with your treating physicians

  • Identifies causation evidence

  • Counters insurer arguments

  • Ensures long-term damages are included

  • Advocates for fair compensation based on real-world impact

For guidance on complex spine injuries or neurological trauma, visit our
Traumatic Brain Injury Resource Page.

VIII. Conclusion: Pre-Existing Conditions Do Not Prevent Compensation

California law protects accident victims whose pre-existing conditions were aggravated by negligence. What matters most is documenting how the injury changed—not whether the victim had a prior issue.

If a collision or fall worsened your back, spine, or neurological symptoms, you have rights. To learn more, visit our
Personal Injury Resource Page.

Featured Articles